The Flip Side of the Stock Market Rally: Energy Reconfiguration, Bitcoin Short Squeeze, and Market Dislocation
Original Article Title: Gulf Disruption Rewires Oil Trade, Strategy Adds $1B in Bitcoin, Shorts Get Cornered
Original Article Author: Talha Chaudhry, 1KONTO
Translation: Peggy, BlockBeats
Editor's Note: Beneath a series of seemingly "bullish" signals, the market is showing a somewhat discordant structure: stock market upsurge, oil price retreat, cooling inflation expectations. Investors are starting to recommit to the narratives of "manageable conflict" and "policy shift." However, taking a longer view reveals that deeper tensions have not dissipated.
On one hand, funds are actively ignoring short-term uncertainty, focusing on potential policy easing and the technological cycle, especially in AI; on the other hand, structural impacts from energy supply, global supply chains, and geopolitical maneuvering are quietly altering the long-term trajectory of demand and prices.
This split is also evident across different markets: stocks are trading the "expected solution," while commodities and macro variables are still reflecting "unresolved issues."
As the gap between narrative and reality continues to widen, the real risks often lie not in the variables that have been discussed, but in those that the market selectively ignores.
Below is the original article:
Market Brief
Digital Asset Market
Strategy increased its holdings by approximately $1 billion in Bitcoin from April 6 to 12, acquiring 13,927 BTC at an average price of $71,902 per BTC. This brought its total holdings to 780,897 BTC. The cumulative cost for these bitcoins was $59.02 billion, with an average holding cost of $75,577, leaving a gap of 19,103 BTC to the target of 800,000.
This purchase was funded by the company through the sale of 10 million shares of its Stretch Perpetual Preferred Stock (STRC) via an At-The-Market (ATM) offering, with no sales of STRF, STRK, STRD, or MSTR. It is noteworthy that after the rule adjustment in March, the issuance size of STRC reached one of its historical highs.
This transaction took place as the company disclosed a $14.46 billion unrealized loss on digital assets for the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, a Bitcoin spot ETF saw a net inflow of $786 million in a single week, with the Bitcoin price briefly surpassing $70,000, then retreating to around $71,000 amid weekend negotiation breakdowns and geopolitical tensions following the announcement of a maritime blockade on April 13.
Macroeconomics
A surge in crude oil tanker traffic heading to the U.S. Gulf Coast is signaling a rapid reshaping of global oil trade in response to the Middle East crisis. Shipping and data analytics companies note that the current number of vessels arriving in the U.S. to load crude oil and then transport it to the tight-supply European and Asian markets is well above normal levels.
With transit through the Strait of Hormuz restricted and hundreds of energy-related vessels queued up for loading, buyers are shifting their supply chains to the U.S., even if it means taking longer routes around Africa. This shift further solidifies the U.S.'s role as a "marginal supplier" and "emergency stabilizer" in the global energy system.
Some analysts see this trend as a shift in the geopolitical landscape, weakening Iran's leverage. It is also a story of logistics and capacity, including the expansion of the Gulf Coast port channels. However, there are macroeconomic considerations at play: on one hand, increased U.S. exports help mitigate global oil price spikes and improve the trade balance; on the other hand, domestic consumers will still feel the pressure of rising gas prices. While the U.S. has become a net oil exporter and is more resilient to oil price shocks than before, this still poses potential political and economic growth risks.
Stock Market
The U.S. stock market rose for a second consecutive trading day as investors, amidst escalating geopolitical uncertainties, chose to "overlook risks" and instead bet on optimistic expectations of a possible U.S.-Iran agreement. The S&P 500 rose by 1.18%, nearing a 1% gap from its 52-week high; the Dow gained 0.66%; the Nasdaq surged 1.96%, led by tech stocks, with standout performances from Oracle, NVIDIA, and Palantir Technologies.
Market sentiment was also boosted by lower-than-expected March Producer Price Index (PPI). Meanwhile, oil prices fell sharply, with WTI dropping by around 7% and Brent crude falling by about 4%.
Earnings results were mixed: Wells Fargo saw its stock price decline due to underwhelming performance, while JPMorgan Chase, despite beating earnings expectations, edged lower due to a cut in net interest income guidance.
Additionally, there were rumors in the market about a potential merger between United Airlines and American Airlines, but it is believed to face rigorous antitrust scrutiny, although both companies' stocks continued to rise.
NVIDIA continued its strong upward momentum, driven primarily by robust demand for AI chips, the release of the open-source "Ising" quantum model, and ongoing heavy capital expenditure by large tech firms; the company also denied acquisition rumors involving PC manufacturers.
The Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has expressed confidence that core inflation will continue to ease this year, providing room for the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates. However, he also acknowledged that it would be reasonable for policymakers to wait for clearer signals on the economic impact of the Iran conflict before taking action.
Data shows that overall inflation rose by 0.9% month-on-month in March, with producer prices up by 0.5%, mainly driven by energy; while core inflation remained significantly subdued at 0.2% and 0.1%, respectively. He noted that following the ceasefire, the decline in U.S. bond yields and oil prices indicates a moderation in inflation expectations.
Currently, the Federal Reserve as a whole leans towards keeping rates unchanged, while political uncertainty is also rising: Jerome Powell's term ends in May, and the confirmation of Kevin Warsh may be delayed due to an investigation into overspending on the Fed building involving Senator Thom Tillis.
Geopolitics
The U.S. and Iran are attempting to arrange a second round of peace talks within the next few days, possibly returning to Pakistan, with the aim of making progress before the current ceasefire agreement expires next week. Iran is also considering temporarily halting shipping through the Strait of Hormuz to ease tensions.
While the Islamabad talks did not yield substantive results, diplomacy is progressing, but the U.S. has begun to implement a naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, restricting Iran's oil exports and warning of intercepting or redirecting vessels related to Iranian ports, while allowing neutral vessels to pass. Market optimism about the prospects of an agreement has caused oil prices to fall and the stock market to rise.
The conflict has already damaged the region's energy infrastructure, disrupted the global supply chain, and raised fuel costs. The International Energy Agency has warned that global oil demand could see its first annual decline since 2020. Meanwhile, Switzerland has offered diplomatic support, Israel continues its actions against Hezbollah in Lebanon, and the U.S. and Iran still have significant disagreements over the nuclear issue — the U.S. proposing a long-term pause plan while Iran leans towards a shorter timeline.
Our Take
Negative Funding Rates, Not $76,000, May Be Bitcoin’s True Bottom Signal
Bitcoin's rejection around $76,000 may not be as significant as the market imagines; what is more noteworthy is the off-chain structure: the derivatives market has seen 46 consecutive days of negative funding rates, indicating that traders have been long-term "paying to short." In a market that typically has a long bias, this situation is exceptionally rare.
The last time sentiment was this one-sided was after the FTX flash crash, when extreme pessimism coincided with the cycle bottom. Of course, this does not mean that history will simply repeat itself; macro environment, regulation, and liquidity variables are still influencing the market. But what can be determined is that the current short position has become significantly crowded.
The real risk may not lie in further decline, but in—once even a mild positive catalyst appears, shorts being forced to cover in a low-liquidity environment could trigger a sharp upward repricing.
Gulf Shockwave Set to Recede, but Some Oil Demand May Be Permanent
The market often views demand destruction as a short-term phenomenon, but historical experience shows that severe supply shocks often leave long-lasting effects.
When price spikes occur alongside supply shortages, airlines retire inefficient aircraft, industrial users adjust production processes, residents and businesses change consumption habits, and governments accelerate energy diversification. These "passive savings" often evolve into "structural demand reduction."
This brings a key second-order risk: when supply in the Gulf region recovers, the speed of supply restoration may outpace demand recovery. At that time, the easing of the spot market may transform into a repricing of the financial market—narrowing spreads, inventory rebound, refining margins decline, and producers will also realize that part of the demand formed during the crisis has permanently disappeared.
Critical Supply Chain Reshoring, Testing Not Just Slogans but Execution
Supply chain reshoring around electrification, national defense, and advanced manufacturing is accelerating, but "urgency" itself cannot solve the problem.
Core segments such as rare earth processing, key metals, and magnets are still highly concentrated in China, exposing the vulnerability of Western supply chains in the current unacceptable level of strategic dependence. Initiatives like USA Rare Earth establishing processing capabilities in France and advancing capacity building in Oklahoma show a clear direction; government involvement also implies that "reshoring" is shifting from a cost issue to a security and resilience issue.
However, the real challenge lies in execution: approval efficiency, long-term financing, skilled labor, and stable downstream demand are all indispensable. If these foundational conditions cannot progress synchronously, supply chain reshoring is likely to remain a high-cost strategic vision rather than a truly implementable industrial capability.
Wishing you successful trading
You may also like

Consumer-grade Crypto Global Survey: Users, Revenue, and Track Distribution

Prediction Markets Under Bias

Stolen: $290 million, Three Parties Refusing to Acknowledge, Who Should Foot the Bill for the KelpDAO Incident Resolution?

ASTEROID Pumped 10,000x in Three Days, Is Meme Season Back on Ethereum?

ChainCatcher Hong Kong Themed Forum Highlights: Decoding the Growth Engine Under the Integration of Crypto Assets and Smart Economy

Why can this institution still grow by 150% when the scale of leading crypto VCs has shrunk significantly?

Anthropic's $1 trillion, compared to DeepSeek's $100 billion

Geopolitical Risk Persists, Is Bitcoin Becoming a Key Barometer?

Annualized 11.5%, Wall Street Buzzing: Is MicroStrategy's STRC Bitcoin's Savior or Destroyer?

An Obscure Open Source AI Tool Alerted on Kelp DAO's $292 million Bug 12 Days Ago

Mixin has launched USTD-margined perpetual contracts, bringing derivative trading into the chat scene.
The privacy-focused crypto wallet Mixin announced today the launch of its U-based perpetual contract (a derivative priced in USDT). Unlike traditional exchanges, Mixin has taken a new approach by "liberating" derivative trading from isolated matching engines and embedding it into the instant messaging environment.
Users can directly open positions within the app with leverage of up to 200x, while sharing positions, discussing strategies, and copy trading within private communities. Trading, social interaction, and asset management are integrated into the same interface.
Based on its non-custodial architecture, Mixin has eliminated friction from the traditional onboarding process, allowing users to participate in perpetual contract trading without identity verification.
The trading process has been streamlined into five steps:
· Choose the trading asset
· Select long or short
· Input position size and leverage
· Confirm order details
· Confirm and open the position
The interface provides real-time visualization of price, position, and profit and loss (PnL), allowing users to complete trades without switching between multiple modules.
Mixin has directly integrated social features into the derivative trading environment. Users can create private trading communities and interact around real-time positions:
· End-to-end encrypted private groups supporting up to 1024 members
· End-to-end encrypted voice communication
· One-click position sharing
· One-click trade copying
On the execution side, Mixin aggregates liquidity from multiple sources and accesses decentralized protocol and external market liquidity through a unified trading interface.
By combining social interaction with trade execution, Mixin enables users to collaborate, share, and execute trading strategies instantly within the same environment.
Mixin has also introduced a referral incentive system based on trading behavior:
· Users can join with an invite code
· Up to 60% of trading fees as referral rewards
· Incentive mechanism designed for long-term, sustainable earnings
This model aims to drive user-driven network expansion and organic growth.
Mixin's derivative transactions are built on top of its existing self-custody wallet infrastructure, with core features including:
· Separation of transaction account and asset storage
· User full control over assets
· Platform does not custody user funds
· Built-in privacy mechanisms to reduce data exposure
The system aims to strike a balance between transaction efficiency, asset security, and privacy protection.
Against the background of perpetual contracts becoming a mainstream trading tool, Mixin is exploring a different development direction by lowering barriers, enhancing social and privacy attributes.
The platform does not only view transactions as execution actions but positions them as a networked activity: transactions have social attributes, strategies can be shared, and relationships between individuals also become part of the financial system.
Mixin's design is based on a user-initiated, user-controlled model. The platform neither custodies assets nor executes transactions on behalf of users.
This model aligns with a statement issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on April 13, 2026, titled "Staff Statement on Whether Partial User Interface Used in Preparing Cryptocurrency Securities Transactions May Require Broker-Dealer Registration."
The statement indicates that, under the premise where transactions are entirely initiated and controlled by users, non-custodial service providers that offer neutral interfaces may not need to register as broker-dealers or exchanges.
Mixin is a decentralized, self-custodial privacy wallet designed to provide secure and efficient digital asset management services.
Its core capabilities include:
· Aggregation: integrating multi-chain assets and routing between different transaction paths to simplify user operations
· High liquidity access: connecting to various liquidity sources, including decentralized protocols and external markets
· Decentralization: achieving full user control over assets without relying on custodial intermediaries
· Privacy protection: safeguarding assets and data through MPC, CryptoNote, and end-to-end encrypted communication
Mixin has been in operation for over 8 years, supporting over 40 blockchains and more than 10,000 assets, with a global user base exceeding 10 million and an on-chain self-custodied asset scale of over $1 billion.

$600 million stolen in 20 days, ushering in the era of AI hackers in the crypto world

Vitalik's 2026 Hong Kong Web3 Summit Speech: Ethereum's Ultimate Vision as the "World Computer" and Future Roadmap

On the same day Aave introduced rsETH, why did Spark decide to exit?

Full Post-Mortem of the KelpDAO Incident: Why Did Aave, Which Was Not Compromised, End Up in Crisis Situation?

After a $290 million DeFi liquidation, is the security promise still there?

ZachXBT's post ignites RAVE nearing zero, what is the truth behind the insider control?



