Grinex Exchange Faces $14M Hack, Trading Suspended
Key Takeaways:
- Grinex, a Kyrgyzstan-registered crypto exchange linked to Russia, lost $13.7 million in an advanced cyberattack.
- US authorities suspect Grinex of facilitating sanctions evasion and laundering activities for Russian hackers.
- The hack involved draining funds from 54 addresses, raising security concerns over sophisticated state-supported cyber intrusions.
- Blockchain analytics reveal potential connections between Grinex and another Kyrgyzstan-based exchange, TokenSpot.
- Analysis suggests hackers smartly converted $15 million worth of USDT to evade asset freezing.
WEEX Crypto News, 2026-04-17 07:11:24
Grinex Halts Trading Post-Hack
The cryptocurrency world was jolted when Grinex, an exchange with ties to Russia, announced the suspension of its trading operations after a staggering $13.7 million hack. This incident represents a major breach within the crypto industry, given that Grinex has been under suspicion for aiding in sanctions evasion alongside conducting laundering for Russia-linked hacker networks. The origins of the attack hint at highly resource-equipped entities, potentially backed by adversarial nations.
Grinex has now provided law enforcement with all relevant details, and a criminal complaint has been filed at the exchange’s infrastructure location. Seen as a successor to the besieged Garantex platform, both exchanges have been under the spotlight for similar illicit activities. The founder of Elliptic, Tom Robinson, implicated Grinex as a paramount platform for trading the ruble-tied stablecoin A7A5, spotlighting its role in circumventing sanctions.
Possible Linkage to TokenSpot
Investigations imply Grinex might not stand as the sole victim. TRM Labs, a respected blockchain intelligence firm, suggests two wallets from TokenSpot, another Kyrgyzstan-based entity, transferred $5,000 to the address utilized by Grinex’s hacker. TokenSpot’s operational hiccup was noted on April 15, with a subsequent service restoration announcement the next day. Additionally, TRM Labs flagged 16 extra addresses connected to the breach, which collectively hold 45.9 million TRX, translating to nearly $15 million.
Detailing the Sophisticated USDT Theft
Not only was the hack bold in its execution, but it also showcased cunning with regards to fund management. Elliptic’s analysis pinpointed the movement of $15 million in USDT away from Grinex. These funds, redirected to Tron or Ethereum accounts, presented a challenge in potentially freezing the assets, hence illustrating a savvy understanding of the blockchain’s vulnerabilities. By transacting this USDT for TRX or ETH, the cybercriminals effectively circumvented the risk of asset freezing by Tether.
Recurring Threats in Sanctions-Evasion Platforms
This breach is not entirely isolated in the crypto landscape. Recalling previous instances, the Iranian exchange, Nobitex, experienced a crippling hack in June 2025, with $81 million depleted by actors claiming a stance pro-Israel. Notably, Grinex’s event underscores a persistent threat in exchanges that have affiliations with nations sidestepping US sanctions.
Grinex had voiced opposition to illegal practices like sanctions evasion or money laundering. However, the recent attack highlights the pervasive security vulnerabilities and geopolitical entanglements that exchanges face when accusations of sanctions-busting arise.
FAQ Section
What is the magnitude of loss in the Grinex hack?
Grinex experienced a loss totaling 1 billion Russian rubles, equivalent to $13.7 million, revealing a critical security lapse and raising stakes about the involvement of hostile state-backed entities.
How does the Grinex incident relate to TokenSpot?
Blockchain intelligence has identified potential on-chain links between Grinex and the Kyrgyzstan-based TokenSpot, suggesting shared vectors for similar security breaches.
Why is the conversion of USDT significant in this hack?
The hackers’ decision to convert USDT to other cryptocurrencies like TRX or ETH displays calculated evasion techniques, thwarting potential asset freezes by companies like Tether.
Has Grinex been implicated in prior illegal activities?
Yes, US authorities have long suspected Grinex of aiding in sanctions evasion and laundering for Russian hacking entities, marking it similar to the former Garantex exchange.
Are similar breaches common in the crypto sector?
Unfortunately, yes. Exchanges with links to nations under US sanctions often face such breaches, as evidenced by the Nobitex hack in 2025, emphasizing ongoing geopolitical and cyber vulnerabilities in cryptocurrency platforms.
You may also like

Consumer-grade Crypto Global Survey: Users, Revenue, and Track Distribution

Prediction Markets Under Bias

Stolen: $290 million, Three Parties Refusing to Acknowledge, Who Should Foot the Bill for the KelpDAO Incident Resolution?

ASTEROID Pumped 10,000x in Three Days, Is Meme Season Back on Ethereum?

ChainCatcher Hong Kong Themed Forum Highlights: Decoding the Growth Engine Under the Integration of Crypto Assets and Smart Economy

Why can this institution still grow by 150% when the scale of leading crypto VCs has shrunk significantly?

Anthropic's $1 trillion, compared to DeepSeek's $100 billion

Geopolitical Risk Persists, Is Bitcoin Becoming a Key Barometer?

Annualized 11.5%, Wall Street Buzzing: Is MicroStrategy's STRC Bitcoin's Savior or Destroyer?

An Obscure Open Source AI Tool Alerted on Kelp DAO's $292 million Bug 12 Days Ago

Mixin has launched USTD-margined perpetual contracts, bringing derivative trading into the chat scene.
The privacy-focused crypto wallet Mixin announced today the launch of its U-based perpetual contract (a derivative priced in USDT). Unlike traditional exchanges, Mixin has taken a new approach by "liberating" derivative trading from isolated matching engines and embedding it into the instant messaging environment.
Users can directly open positions within the app with leverage of up to 200x, while sharing positions, discussing strategies, and copy trading within private communities. Trading, social interaction, and asset management are integrated into the same interface.
Based on its non-custodial architecture, Mixin has eliminated friction from the traditional onboarding process, allowing users to participate in perpetual contract trading without identity verification.
The trading process has been streamlined into five steps:
· Choose the trading asset
· Select long or short
· Input position size and leverage
· Confirm order details
· Confirm and open the position
The interface provides real-time visualization of price, position, and profit and loss (PnL), allowing users to complete trades without switching between multiple modules.
Mixin has directly integrated social features into the derivative trading environment. Users can create private trading communities and interact around real-time positions:
· End-to-end encrypted private groups supporting up to 1024 members
· End-to-end encrypted voice communication
· One-click position sharing
· One-click trade copying
On the execution side, Mixin aggregates liquidity from multiple sources and accesses decentralized protocol and external market liquidity through a unified trading interface.
By combining social interaction with trade execution, Mixin enables users to collaborate, share, and execute trading strategies instantly within the same environment.
Mixin has also introduced a referral incentive system based on trading behavior:
· Users can join with an invite code
· Up to 60% of trading fees as referral rewards
· Incentive mechanism designed for long-term, sustainable earnings
This model aims to drive user-driven network expansion and organic growth.
Mixin's derivative transactions are built on top of its existing self-custody wallet infrastructure, with core features including:
· Separation of transaction account and asset storage
· User full control over assets
· Platform does not custody user funds
· Built-in privacy mechanisms to reduce data exposure
The system aims to strike a balance between transaction efficiency, asset security, and privacy protection.
Against the background of perpetual contracts becoming a mainstream trading tool, Mixin is exploring a different development direction by lowering barriers, enhancing social and privacy attributes.
The platform does not only view transactions as execution actions but positions them as a networked activity: transactions have social attributes, strategies can be shared, and relationships between individuals also become part of the financial system.
Mixin's design is based on a user-initiated, user-controlled model. The platform neither custodies assets nor executes transactions on behalf of users.
This model aligns with a statement issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on April 13, 2026, titled "Staff Statement on Whether Partial User Interface Used in Preparing Cryptocurrency Securities Transactions May Require Broker-Dealer Registration."
The statement indicates that, under the premise where transactions are entirely initiated and controlled by users, non-custodial service providers that offer neutral interfaces may not need to register as broker-dealers or exchanges.
Mixin is a decentralized, self-custodial privacy wallet designed to provide secure and efficient digital asset management services.
Its core capabilities include:
· Aggregation: integrating multi-chain assets and routing between different transaction paths to simplify user operations
· High liquidity access: connecting to various liquidity sources, including decentralized protocols and external markets
· Decentralization: achieving full user control over assets without relying on custodial intermediaries
· Privacy protection: safeguarding assets and data through MPC, CryptoNote, and end-to-end encrypted communication
Mixin has been in operation for over 8 years, supporting over 40 blockchains and more than 10,000 assets, with a global user base exceeding 10 million and an on-chain self-custodied asset scale of over $1 billion.

$600 million stolen in 20 days, ushering in the era of AI hackers in the crypto world

Vitalik's 2026 Hong Kong Web3 Summit Speech: Ethereum's Ultimate Vision as the "World Computer" and Future Roadmap

On the same day Aave introduced rsETH, why did Spark decide to exit?

Full Post-Mortem of the KelpDAO Incident: Why Did Aave, Which Was Not Compromised, End Up in Crisis Situation?

After a $290 million DeFi liquidation, is the security promise still there?

ZachXBT's post ignites RAVE nearing zero, what is the truth behind the insider control?






